返回 
加入收藏
利用CiteSpace软件分析国内外药物经济学的研究现状
x
请在关注微信后，向客服人员索取文件
| 篇名： | 利用CiteSpace软件分析国内外药物经济学的研究现状 |
| TITLE： | |
| 摘要： | 目的：分析国内外药物经济学的研究热点，找出国内药物经济学研究存在的不足。方法：以“Pharmacoeconomics”为英文主题词，“药物经济学”为中文主题词，分别检索Web of Science核心合集数据库和中国知网数据库中SCI来源期刊、EI来源期刊、中文核心期刊、CSSCI的文献，利用CiteSpace软件从学科分析、主题词分析、被引分析、关键词聚类分析、研究前沿分析共五个方面分析2007年1月－2017年10月国内外药物经济学文献的研究热点与研究趋势。结果：共纳入英文文献912篇、中文文献486篇。学科分析发现，关于药物经济学国外的研究主要集中在“药理学与药学”“保健科学与服务”等学科，国内的研究主要集中在“药学”“工业经济学”等学科；主题词分析发现，英文文献中“生活质量”“成本效益分析”等关键词出现频率较高，中文文献中“成本效果分析”“药物经济学评价”等关键词出现频率较高；被引分析发现，英文文献中被引次数前5的文献大多是相关政府部门或组织发布或提出的研究报告，而中文文献中被引次数前5的文献多是个人撰写的研究论文；聚类分析发现，中文文献药物经济学的研究主要集中在药品价格、药品政策、对不同药品和治疗方案的成本效果分析上，相较于英文文献，中文文献药物经济学研究在药品的长期安全、药品的风险评估、患者的健康等方面还有所欠缺。结论：国内关于药物经济学的研究热点仍然集中在不同治疗方案的成本效果分析方面，相较于国外研究，缺乏对居民卫生保健以及质量调整生命年等方面的研究。另外，国内对药物经济学的研究不足、质量较低，限制了药物经济学在国内的应用。 |
| ABSTRACT： | OBJECTIVE： To analyze the research hotspots of pharmacoeconomics at home and abroad， and find out the shortcomings of pharmacoeconomics research in China. METHODS： Using “Pharmacoeconomice” as English subject and “pharmacoeconomics” as Chinese subject， SCI source journal， EI source journal， Chinese core journal and CSSCI literatures were retrieved from Web of Science core collection database and CNKI. The research hotspots and trend of pharmacoeconomics at home and abroad during Jan. 2007-Oct. 2017 were studied by using CiteSpace software in respects of subject analysis， topic analysis， citation analysis and keyword cluster analysis. RESULTS： A total of 912 English literatures and 486 Chinese literatures were included. Subject analysis showed that foreign researches on pharmacoeconomics focused on “pharmacology and pharmacy” “health science and service”， etc； domestic researches focused on “pharmacy” “industrial economics”， etc. Topic analysis showed that key words such as “quality of life” and “cost benefit analysis” appeared frequently in English literatures； key words such as “cost effectiveness analysis” “pharmacoeconomic evaluation” appeared frequently in Chinese literatures. Citation analysis showed that the top 5 cited literatures in English literatures were mostly issued or put forward by related government departments or organizations’ research reports； the top 5 cited literatures in Chinese literature were mostly research papers written by individuals. Cluster analysis showed that domestic pharmacoeconomics research mainly focused on drug price， drug policy and cost-effectiveness analysis of different drugs and treatment programs； compared with English literature， Chinese literature pharmacoeconomics still lacked in drug long-term safety， drug risk assessment and patient health. CONCLUSIONS： Domestic pharmacoeconomic researches are still focused on cost-effectiveness analysis of different treatment plans， but lack of research on residents’ health care， quality adjustment life year compared with foreign researches. In addition， domestic pharmacoeconomic research were not enough， and research quality is in low level， which limits the application of pharmacoeconomics in China. |
| 期刊： | 2018年第29卷第11期 |
| 作者： | 袁静，汤少梁 |
| AUTHORS： | YUAN Jing，TANG Shaoliang |
| 关键字： | 药物经济学；CiteSpace软件；学科；主题词；被引；聚类 |
| KEYWORDS： | Pharmacoeconomics； CiteSpace software； Subject； Topic； Citation； Cluster |
| 阅读数： | 667 次 |
| 本月下载数： | 21 次 |
* 注：未经本站明确许可，任何网站不得非法盗链资源下载连接及抄袭本站原创内容资源!在此感谢您的支持与合作！
