返回 
加入收藏
B2C药品交易市场中的平台服务定价研究
x
请在关注微信后，向客服人员索取文件
| 篇名： | B2C药品交易市场中的平台服务定价研究 |
| TITLE： | |
| 摘要： |
摘 要 目的：探讨不同类型B2C药品交易平台的服务定价问题及影响因素，为网络医药零售实现高效运营提供参考。方法：以 双边市场为理论基础，结合互联网交易服务的特点，构建联营模式以及自营+联营模式两类B2C药品交易平台的服务定价模型， 探讨分成比例、搜索匹配度、选择自营消费者比例对平台服务定价的影响，并利用层次分析法等进行实证验证。结果：成功构建了 联营模式以及自营+联营模式两类B2C药品交易平台的服务定价模型；确定了分成比例、搜索匹配度对平台服务定价（供应商）分 别呈逆向作用和正向作用，在自营+联营模式药品交易平台中，当选择平台自营的消费者比例过高时，平台将会降低供应商的注册 费，当选择平台自营的消费者比例过低时，平台将会提高供应商的注册费；实证验证中采用层次分析法确定自营消费者比例为 0.648，在此条件下对两类运营模式的定价模型进行比较，与上述结果一致；同时，自营+联营模式的服务定价整体上总是低于联营 模式。结论：无论是联营模式还是自营+联营模式的平台，可设置不同的注册费与广告收入分成比例，实行差异化定价；也可通过 增加更多专业咨询服务，脱离同质化竞争，增加用户黏度，提高平台搜索匹配度；对于自营+联营模式的平台，需要控制好自营与联 营的比例，实现平台的健康有效运营。
|
| ABSTRACT： |
ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE：To provide reference for the efficient operation of online drug retailing by studying the service pricing
and influencing factors of different B2C drug trading platforms. METHODS：Based on the theory of two-sided markets and
combined with the characteristics of internet transaction service，the pricing models of B2C drug trading platform from the
perspective of joint mode and joint & self mode were built. The influence of allocation proportion，search matching degree and the
proportion of consumers who buy drugs from the platform of self mode were discussed. Finally，AHP method was adopted for
empirical verification. RESULTS：The service pricing models of two B2C drug trading platforms，i.e. joint model and joint & self
model，had been successfully constructed. It had been determined that the proportion of sharing and the degree of search matching
had adverse and positive effects on the platform service pricing（suppliers），respectively. In the joint & self mode drug trading
platform，when the proportion of consumers who chose self mode platform was too high，the platform would reduce the supplier’
s registration fee；when the proportion of consumers who chose the self mode platform was too low，the platform would increase the registration fee of suppliers. In the empirical verification，AHP method was used to determine the proportion of self-employed
consumers as 0.648. Under this condition，the pricing models of the two operation modes were compared，which was consistent
with the above results. At the same time，the service pricing of joint & self model is always lower than that of joint mode.
CONCLUSIONS：No matter the platform of joint mode or joint & self mode，different proportion of registration fee and
advertising revenue can be set to implement differential pricing. The platforms also can degenerate from homogeneity competition，
increase user viscosity and improve platform search matching by providing more professional services. For the platform of joint &
self mode，it is necessary to control the ratio of self and joint part，and realize the healthy and effective operation of the platform.
|
| 期刊： | 2020年第31卷第1期 |
| 作者： | 章 瑞，李红艳 |
| AUTHORS： | ZHANG Rui，LI Hongyan |
| 关键字： | B2C药品交易平台；定价；双边市场；自营模式；自营+联营模式 |
| KEYWORDS： | B2C drug trading platform；Pricing；Two-sided markets theory；Joint mode；Joint & self mode |
| 阅读数： | 311 次 |
| 本月下载数： | 9 次 |
* 注：未经本站明确许可，任何网站不得非法盗链资源下载连接及抄袭本站原创内容资源!在此感谢您的支持与合作！
