返回 
加入收藏
儿童医院视角下药学人员科研指标评价体系的构建
x
请在关注微信后，向客服人员索取文件
| 篇名： | 儿童医院视角下药学人员科研指标评价体系的构建 |
| TITLE： | Construction of a scientific research indicator evaluation system for pharmaceutical personnel from the perspective of children’s hospital |
| 摘要： | 目的 构建适用于儿童医院药学人员的科研指标评价体系，为药学人员的科研能力评价提供技术支持和参考依据。方法运用文献/文本调研法，查找科研管理的相关文献、政策法规和研究报告；采用头脑风暴法梳理关键要素，逐级分解各级指标。在此基础上，使用专家访谈法，明确关键要素，初步拟定三级指标评价体系，并据此制作函询问卷。最后运用德尔菲法，通过3项筛选标准[重要性赋值＞3.5、变异系数＜25%、不重要百分比（包括不太重要和很不重要）＜50%]，建立药学人员科研指标评价体系。结果两轮专家函询均发放问卷36份，回收36份，回收率和有效率均为100%。两轮函询专家的判断系数平均值为0.912，熟悉程度平均值为0.747，专家权威系数平均值为0.830。经过第二轮函询后，一级指标的肯德尔协调系数为0.269，二级指标为0.379，三级指标为0.460，均显著高于第一轮专家函询结果（P＜0.01）。最终确定了药学人员科研指标评价体系一级指标4个、二级指标18个、三级指标62个。结论本研究所选儿童医院药学专家权威性较高、专业覆盖面广；构建的药学人员科研指标评价体系具有一定的标准性和规范性，可为药学人员的专业水平考核、科研能力评价提供有力参考。 |
| ABSTRACT： | OBJECTIVE To establish a research indicator evaluation system suitable for pharmaceutical personnel in children’s hospitals， and provide technical support and reference basis for the evaluation of scientific research capabilities of pharmacy personnel. METHODS The literature/text research methods were adopted to search related literature， policies， regulations and research reports of scientific research management； brainstorming method was used to sort out the key elements and decompose the indicators at all levels step by step. On this basis， using the method of expert interview， the key elements were clarified， the three- level index evaluation system was preliminarily drawn up， and the letter inquiry paper was made accordingly. Finally， Delphi method was used to establish the evaluation system of scientific research indicators for pharmacists through three screening criteria [importance assignment＞3.5， coefficient of variation＜25%， and unimportant percentage （including unimportant and very unimportant）＜50%]. RESULTS Overall 36 questionnaires were distributed by two rounds of expert letters， and 36 questionnaires were recovered， with a recovery rate and an effective rate of 100% for both rounds. The average expert judgment coefficient was 0.912， the average expert familiarity level was 0.747， and the average expert authority coefficient was 0.830. After the second round of letters and inquiries， the values of Kendall’s W of the first-level， the second-level and the third-level indicators were 0.269， 0.379 and 0.460， which were significantly higher than the results of the first round of inquiry （P＜0.01）. Finally， the evaluation system of scientific research indicators for pharmacists was determined with 4 first-level indicators， 18 second-level indicators and 62 third-level indicators. CONCLUSIONS The pharmaceutical experts from the children’s hospital selected in this study have high authority and wide professional coverage； the evaluation system of scientific research indicators for pharmacists has certain standards and norms， which can provide a powerful reference for the professional level assessment and scientific research ability evaluation of pharmacists. |
| 期刊： | 2024年第35卷第18期 |
| 作者： | 高艳；李欣；高翔；孙燕燕 |
| AUTHORS： | GAO Yan，LI Xin，GAO Xiang，SUN Yanyan |
| 关键字： | 科研能力评价；评价指标体系；儿童医院；儿科药师 |
| KEYWORDS： | evaluation of scientific research ability； evaluation indicator system； children’s hospital； pediatric pharmacist |
| 阅读数： | 4 次 |
| 本月下载数： | 0 次 |
* 注：未经本站明确许可，任何网站不得非法盗链资源下载连接及抄袭本站原创内容资源!在此感谢您的支持与合作！
